11.2 C
New York
Friday, May 1, 2026
Home Blog Page 154

Trump says he’s ready to move to second phase of sanctions against Russia

0



President Trump said Sunday he’s ready to move forward with the second phase of sanctions against Russia amid stalled peace talks to end the war with Ukraine.

“Yeah, I am,” Trump told a reporter, who asked whether he’s ready to move forward with Phase 2 of the sanctions.

Trump has bristled at the suggestion he has not taken action against Russia, which has continued to bombard Ukraine with drone strikes amid efforts by Trump and others to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine.

Asked on Wednesday why he’s not taken action against Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump objected to the premise, pointing to the tariffs he imposed on India over its purchase of Russian oil, and he suggested that step was merely the first phase.

“How do you know there’s no action? Would you say that putting secondary sanctions on India — the largest purchaser outside of China, they’re almost equal — would you say there’s no action?” Trump said, referring to the additional 25 percent tariffs placed on India for purchases of Russian oil.  

“That cost hundreds of billions of dollars to Russia. You call that no action? And I haven’t done Phase 2 yet or Phase 3,” the president added.

The move toward additional sanctions on Russia comes as progress has appeared to stall on efforts to broker a deal to end the war in Eastern Europe. The president has sought to arrange a meeting between Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, but there has been little progress on getting the two leaders together.

Four sometimes conflicting ways to think about the economy

0


Last year, I wrote about how there are can be informed: hard economic data, soft economic data, the stock market, and your personal biases.

The point is that it’s possible to have what appear to be conflicting views of the economy, even though you’re not disagreeing on the facts.

Let me demonstrate by offering my views on the current state of the economy .

Hard data is anything that reflects quantifiable and observable behavior — stuff that is actually happening. These include metrics such as employment and personal spending, which help us determine whether the economy is in expansion or .

From the perspective of hard data, I don’t feel as great about the economy .

The hard data have cooled so much that we are arguably . Job creation has fallen to near zero, personal consumption has plateaued, industrial production is going sideways, and capex order activity is off its high.

Notably, the ratio of job openings per unemployed persons fell below 1:1 in July for the first time in over four years.

There are now fewer job openings than there are unemployed people.

While this ratio continues to suggest there are many jobs for the taking, the situation is nowhere near as robust as it was during the early stages of the current economic expansion.

Economists often discuss the relationship between job openings and unemployment with the , which shows that declining job openings are correlated with rising unemployment.

“We’re operating along a segment of the Beveridge Curve where declines in excess labor demand, as proxied by falling job openings, will result in larger increases in the unemployment rate,” Renaissance Macro’s Neil Dutta wrote on Wednesday. “Not good.”

I’m not convinced that we are doomed to fall into recession. However, I think it is increasingly hard to argue that growth is destiny.

For more, read: ⚖️

Soft data is generated through surveys of consumers and business operators expressing their opinions, feelings, and expectations about things like job security, financial health, inflation, future business activity, and labor quality. Popular reports capturing soft data include , the , and the .

Unions warn government not to water down workers’ rights bill

0


The leader of the UK’s biggest trade union has warned it would be a “huge mistake” for the government to water down its Employment Rights Bill, which is due to become law in the next few weeks.

Unison general secretary Christina McAnea said she is concerned the government is no longer committed to implementing the bill in full, following Angela Rayner’s departure and the cabinet reshuffle. Other unions have also raised concerns.

The legislation would be a major shake-up of workers’ rights, which would include protection against unfair dismissal, and a ban on “exploitative” zero-hours contracts.

The warnings come as a senior Labour MP told the BBC that the bill risks being ”slow walked”.

The MP warned: ”Many Labour colleagues fear that with the economy under strain, ministers may be tempted to drag their feet on implementation as an olive branch to business.”

At the Trades Union Congress in Brighton, senior union figures have voiced their concerns that the bill would be watered down following the departure of Angela Rayner, the sacking of Justin Madders as employment minister and the decision to move Jonathan Reynolds from business secretary to chief whip.

Trade union leaders are very worried. With Angela Rayner gone, they fear they have lost a fierce champion for workers rights in government.

Unison represents more than a million workers, many in relatively low paid jobs. The general secretary, Christina McAnea, is normally very loyal to the government.

“It’s very significant and very worrying that they’ve been moved,” Ms McAnea told the BBC.

“It doesn’t send out a very good message that the people who were absolutely committed to driving through the employment rights bill are no longer doing those jobs,” she said.

“No names are coming forward that really fill me with confidence that the party is still committed and the government is still committed to taking this through.”

The proposed legislation was a “once in a lifetime opportunity” for the government to “shift the dial just slightly in favour of working people,” she said.

Other union leaders felt the same way, Ms McAnea said, and that any attempt to “pull back” on the bill would be a “huge mistake” that unions would “furiously” campaign against.

“We will do everything we can to make sure this is not watered down. We’re expecting a clear timetable, and if that doesn’t happen, there will be some very very unhappy trade union leaders around, including me,” she said.

The TUC, the umbrella group for trade unions in the UK, also urged the government to “stay on course” in delivering the bill.

Its general secretary Paul Novak told the BBC: “I am confident that the government will deliver on its commitments to enact that employment rights bill in full.”

Concern is coming from unions on the right of the trade union movement, not the usual suspects who might be expected to criticise the government.

Mr Novak said the bill “will give a massive boost to rights for millions of working people in this country, lots of whom are in insecure, low-paid employment”.

“My message to the government is, stay on course, deliver the employment rights bill, and deliver it in full,” he said.

He also pushed back on the idea the government could make concessions to business in the legislation.

“I think that’s the last thing government should countenance”, Mr Novak said.

“Having people in well-paid, secure employment is good for everybody. It’s good for workers, but it’s also good for the good employers who are being undercut by the cowboys, and it’s good for the UK economy.”

The USDAW union represents more than 300,000 workers, many of whom work in supermarkets, factories and warehouses.

The union is concerned that an amendment to the Employment Rights Bill, which was added by the House of Lords in July, could be adopted by the government.

The amendment seeks to change the bill from a requirement for an employer to offer guaranteed hours to a right to request guaranteed hours by an employee.

The union is concerned that this would be a weakening of their members’ rights because there would no longer be a right to a contract that reflects their normal hours of work.

The Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) has told the BBC that Angela Rayner’s resignation and the government reshuffle present an opportunity to “fix the issues” with the Employment Rights Bill.

“In some of our recent polling of members, 92% of employers said they were worried about this legislation. We have never got to that level in a poll,” said Craig Beaumont, director of policy at the FSB.

“They are overwhelmed by the changes that are coming. They don’t have HR teams. All these different measures scare them, and this is a chance to fix the issues.”

Mr Beaumont said that Rayner’s resignation and the sacking of employment minister Madders – two key government supporters of the bill – could allow for some compromise.

Trump says he’s ‘not going to war’ with Chicago after Democratic criticism

0



President Trump on Sunday said he’s “not going to war” with Chicago despite his recent social media post that depicted the city in an apocalypse and hinted at impending war.

Asked whether he was “threatening to go to war with Chicago,” Trump told reporters, “We’re not going to war. We’re going to clean up our cities.”

“We’re going to clean them up, so they don’t kill 5 people every weekend. That’s not war. That’s common sense,” Trump added.

Trump has suggested in recent weeks that Chicago would be his next target for a large-scale immigration enforcement operation.

He has escalated his threats in recent days, and, on Saturday, posted an artificially generated image of his likeness as a law enforcement officer. The AI-generated image’s background included a depiction of Chicago burning, with several helicopters and text that read, “Chipocalypse Now” — a nod to the 1979 film “Apocalypse Now” and to the city of Chicago.

“I love the smell of deportations in the morning… Chicago about to find out why it’s called the Department of WAR,” Trump wrote, referring to his recent executive order renaming the Department of Defense as the Department of War.

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D) fired back in a social media post.

“The President of the United States is threatening to go to war with an American city,” Pritzker wrote. This is not a joke. This is not normal.”

“Donald Trump isn’t a strongman, he’s a scared man,” he added. “Illinois won’t be intimidated by a wannabe dictator.”

Trump border czar Tom Homan said on Sunday that Chicago should “absolutely” expect to see immigration enforcement action in the city this coming week, saying that could include National Guard troops.

Oregon dominates Cowboys after Gundy ‘pours gasoline on fire’

0


EUGENE, Ore. — A week that began with coaches Mike Gundy and Dan Lanning trading barbs about each program’s budget ended with Oregon handing Oklahoma State a 69-3 loss — the worst of the Gundy era and the worst the program has seen since 1907.

“It never requires extra motivation for an opportunity to go out and kick ass,” Lanning said postgame regarding the message he sent his team. “But it never hurts when somebody pours gasoline on the fire.”

On Monday while speaking on his radio show, Gundy said Oregon is “paying a lot of money for their team,” citing $40 million as the amount he believed the Ducks spent on their roster last year. Gundy made several other comments about Oregon’s resources, saying “it’ll cost a lot of money to keep” quarterback Dante Moore and that he believes Oregon’s budget should determine the programs it schedules outside of the Big Ten.

“If you want to be a top-10 team in college football, you better be invested in winning. We spend to win,” Lanning said Monday in response. “Some people save to have an excuse for why they don’t. … I can’t speak on their situation. I have no idea what they got in their pockets over there.”

After Saturday’s win, Moore said Gundy’s comments hit “close to home” for him and the rest of the team and that the Ducks used them as motivation heading into the matchup.

“For him to attack Phil [Knight], Coach Lanning and our team was personal,” said Moore, who threw for 266 yards and three touchdowns. “We were going to keep the foot on the neck and make sure we score these points and try to break the scoreboard.”

Break the scoreboard, they did. The Ducks had a 59-yard touchdown run on their second offensive play and a 65-yard touchdown pass on their third offensive play. Explosive plays were everywhere at Autzen Stadium as Oklahoma State’s defense provided little to no resistance. Oregon’s offense did not punt until the fourth quarter and totaled 631 yards to Oklahoma State’s 211 yards.

“It was a lot of fire going into this game,” Moore said.

The way Oregon came out of the gates, stepped on the gas pedal and didn’t relent until it was up 48-3 halfway through the third quarter, when it brought in the offensive backups, seemed very purposeful. The two pick-sixes that pushed the Ducks’ score into the 60s added insult to injury.

“It’s still about us,” Lanning said. “Our ability to ignore the noise is the thing that’s going to make us go.”

Lanning, as he did on Monday, said postgame that he has a lot of respect for Gundy and even noted that the result probably had the Oklahoma State coach saying “I told you so” regarding his comments about the disparity in resources between the schools.

“When I made that comment, I was complimenting Oregon for what they had done,” Gundy said. “Second thing, which I said later in the week is, we’ve made commitments also, but we have to be better and fundamentally sound and execute.”

Gundy is now 4-10 over his past 14 games, and two of those losses — Saturday’s at Oregon and last year’s 52-0 loss to Colorado — are the worst of his career.

“Sometimes you’re going to play people that have the ability to run away from you,” Gundy said. “We gotta look at that and see where we’re at. We didn’t play good enough, in the systems that we had, to put ourselves in that position.”

As the heat rises around the coach who has helmed the Oklahoma State program since 2005, Gundy’s son, Gavin, took to X to defend his father.

“Mike Gundy IS Oklahoma State football,” Gavin said as part of a long thread of posts. “Period. As QB, he set records in the Barry Sanders era. As coach, he stacked 160+ wins, 19 straight bowls, a Big 12 title, two Fiesta Bowls, multiple Top-10 finishes, & sent dudes to the NFL year after year. He’s the winningest coach in OSU history & the most important name this program has EVER had. Without him, you’d have nothing to brag about, nothing to watch, nothing to cry about.”

Soon after, Gavin’s thread was deleted from the site.

Kohl’s Corporation (KSS) Had A “Decent Last Quarter,” Said Jim Cramer

0


We recently published 10 Stocks Jim Cramer Discussed As He Warned About Big Risk To Big Tech. Kohl’s Corporation (NYSE:KSS) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed.

Retailer Kohl’s Corporation (NYSE:KSS)’s shares have gained 17% year-to-date, courtesy of a 71% gain since mid-July. The stock rose after the firm’s second fiscal quarter earnings beat analyst estimates by a wide margin. While Wall Street had penciled in an EPS of $0.29, Kohl’s Corporation (NYSE:KSS) posted $0.56 in earnings, which was nearly double the expectations. Cramer’s previous comments about the firm have wondered whether Kohl’s Corporation (NYSE:KSS) got a free ride when it comes to avoiding expectations of tariffs impacting its business. Here are his recent thoughts about the firm:

“I will say that I think that when you have say, Kohl’s, getting Sephora in, that would reverse the decline of Kohl’s for a bit. Now Kohl’s did have a decent last quarter.”

Kohl’s Corporation (KSS) Had A "Decent Last Quarter," Said Jim Cramer
Kohl’s Corporation (KSS) Had A “Decent Last Quarter,” Said Jim Cramer

Photo by Heidi Fin on Unsplash

Here’s what Cramer said about Kohl’s Corporation (NYSE:KSS) and tariffs:

“People perceive them as not having a, of eating some, but not all of the tariffs. Now everybody else had the same thing, but somehow they got hit with that idea and I thought it wasn’t right. Whereas Kohl’s, got, the free ride. The free ride.”

While we acknowledge the potential of KSS as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock.

READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now.

Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.

England vs South Africa third ODI – highlights

0


Jacob Bethell’s maiden century and Jofra Archer’s 4-18 with the ball help England to a men’s One Day International record win of 342 runs in the third match of the series against South Africa in Southampton.

MATCH REPORT: England v South Africa – third ODI

Available to UK users only.

Moore: 'I'm not running for president'

0



Maryland Gov. Wes Moore (D), seen as a rising star in the Democratic Party, on Sunday ruled out running for president in the 2028 election.

Moore — who has emerged as a formidable opponent of the president in recent weeks — was asked in an interview on NBC News’s “Meet the Press” whether he plans on running for reelection in 2026 and whether he would commit to serving a full term, if reelected, amid questions of a possible 2028 run for president.

“Yes, I’ll be serving a full term,” Moore said in the interview. “I’m excited about reelection. I’m excited about what I’m going to be able to do for the people of Maryland.”

NBC News’s Kristen Welker then pressed the governor on his ambitions for higher office.

“Do you rule out a run for president, governor?”

“Yeah, I’m not running for president,” Moore responded.

“You rule it out?” Welker asked.

“Yes, I’m not running for president,” he said.

“You completely rule it out?” Welker asked again.

“I’m so excited about what we’re doing. That we’ve gone from 43rd in the country in unemployment to now one of the lowest unemployment rates. We’ve had among the fastest drops in violent crime anywhere in the United States of America. Our population is growing, Maryland is moving,” Moore said. “And so, I’m really excited about going back in front of the people of my state and asking for another term.”

Moore has seen his national profile rise in recent weeks as hie has engaged in a public feud with President Trump over the president’s threat to deploy the National Guard to Baltimore.

Cathie Wood buys $13.4 million of battered stocks

0


Cathie Wood, head of Ark Investment Management, is an active trader. She frequently buys her favorite stocks when they fall and sells them when they rise.

That’s what she just did, buying into two hot stocks that have been struggling for a while.

Wood’s funds have experienced a volatile ride this year, swinging from sharp losses to strong gains.

In January and February, the Ark funds rallied as investors bet on the Trump administration’s potential deregulation that could benefit Wood’s tech bets. But the momentum faded in March and April, with the funds trailing the market as top holdings slid amid growing concerns over the macroeconomy and trade policies.

Now, the Ark’s funds are showing solid performance again. As of Sept. 5, the flagship Ark Innovation ETF  (ARKK)  is up 30.8% year-to-date, far outpacing the S&P 500’s 10.2% gain.

Wood’s remarkable return of 153% in 2020 helped build her reputation and attract loyal investors. Her strategy can lead to sharp gains during bull markets but also painful losses, like in 2022, when ARKK dropped more than 60%.

Those swings have weighed on her long-term results. As of Sept. 4, the Ark Innovation ETF has delivered a five-year annualized return of negative 2.4%, while the S&P 500 has an annualized return of 15.4% over the same period.

Over the past 12 months through Sept. 4, the Ark Innovation ETF saw about $1.5 billion in net outflows, according to data from ETF research firm VettaFi.Image source: Fallon/AFP via Getty Images
Over the past 12 months through Sept. 4, the Ark Innovation ETF saw about $1.5 billion in net outflows, according to data from ETF research firm VettaFi.Image source: Fallon/AFP via Getty Images

Wood’s investment strategy is straightforward: Her Ark ETFs typically buy shares in emerging high-tech companies in fields such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, biomedical technology, and robotics.

She thinks these companies have the potential to reshape industries and bring outsized long-term returns, but their volatility leads to major fluctuations in Ark funds’ values.

Related: Cathie Wood’s net worth: The Ark Invest CEO’s wealth & income

Over the 10 years ending in 2024, the Ark Innovation ETF wiped out $7 billion in investor wealth, according to an analysis by Morningstar’s analyst Amy Arnott. That made it the third-biggest wealth destroyer among mutual funds and ETFs in Arnott’s ranking.

Still, Wood has been bullish on the market. In a letter to investors published in late April, she dismissed predictions of a recession dragging into 2026 and struck an optimistic tone for tech stocks.

“During the current turbulent transition in the U.S., we think consumers and businesses are likely to accelerate the shift to technologically enabled innovation platforms including artificial intelligence, robotics, energy storage, blockchain technology, and multiomics sequencing,” she said.

More military sites could house asylum seekers, says John Healey

0


Paul SeddonPolitical reporter

John Healey says the government are determined to end the use of hotels for asylum seekers

The defence secretary has said the government is looking at expanding the use of military sites to house asylum seekers, as it seeks to move people out of hotels.

John Healey also confirmed officials were considering other types of “non-military” accommodation.

Just over 32,000 asylum seekers are currently in hotels, which represents about a third of the total number being housed in taxpayer-funded accommodation.

Labour wants to accelerate its plan to end the use of hotels, which have become a focal point for anti-migrant protests.

Reports say that Shabana Mahmood, who replaced Yvette Cooper as home secretary on Friday, is set to announce proposals to house asylum seekers on military land within weeks.

Two former military sites – MDP Wethersfield, a former RAF base in Essex, and Napier Barracks, a former military base in Kent – are already being used to house asylum seekers after being opened under the previous Tory government.

Speaking on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, the defence secretary confirmed the government was looking at additional “military and non-military sites for potential temporary accommodation”.

His department is yet to confirm a list of sites, but Healey added that military planners were working with the Home Office on options.

“What you are seeing from Keir Starmer now is this isn’t just a job for the Home Office, it’s an all of government effort,” he added.

The Home Office confirmed 1,097 people crossed the English Channel in small boats on Saturday, Mahmood’s first full day in the job, underscoring the scale of the challenge she faces.

The total number of crossings so far this year is now more than 30,000, the earliest point in a calendar year where that threshold has been reached.

Rising costs

Since entering office, Labour has shelved plans drawn up under the Conservatives to house asylum seekers at RAF Scampton in Lincolnshire, arguing the proposal failed to deliver value for money for the taxpayer.

However, the government is expected to increase the number of migrants living at the former site of RAF Wethersfield in Essex. Napier Barracks in Kent, which had been due to stop housing asylum seekers this month, is also set to stay open longer.

The use of hotels to house asylum seekers has grown significantly since around 2020, with total accommodation contracts now set to be worth £15.3bn over a 10-year period.

Figures last month showed 32,059 asylum seekers were in hotels at the end of June – higher than before Labour took office, but well down on a peak of 56,042 in September 2023 under the previous government.

A further 74,016 were in taxpayer-funded housing, the majority of it so-called “dispersal” accommodation, such as rented flats, which is more long-term.

Prefab buildings

Downing Street has previously confirmed officials were looking to house asylum seekers in prefabricated buildings on a range of sites, including industrial land.

Cooper, the new foreign secretary, had also previously said her old department was considering housing people in warehouses.

The Conservatives have blamed this year’s high level of Channel crossings on Labour’s decision to scrap their plan to deport some asylum seekers to Rwanda – which they failed to get up and running before losing the last election.

Speaking to Kuenssberg, Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said Sir Keir “had no plan in place” to replace the “deterrent” offered by their Rwanda plan.

Reform UK, which says it could deport 600,000 people within five years if it takes power, says it would also house people arriving into the UK illegally in prefabricated, or “modular” detention centres, prior to removal.

The party says it would build a series of new removal centres in “remote parts of the country” but has refused to set out particular locations.

It says the new centres would be “basic but not punitive”, containing prefabricated two-person rooms, on-site medical facilities, and canteen catering.

Speaking to Sky News, Zia Yusuf, Reform’s head of policy, denied this would include shipping containers, adding: “They’re not shipping containers, they’re purpose-built modular steel structures”.