-2.4 C
New York
Wednesday, January 21, 2026
Home Blog Page 881

ICC Issues Vladimir Putin Arrest Warrant Over Ukraine

0

The International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday, accusing him of war crimes over the invasion of Ukraine.

Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova, Russia’s commissioner for children’s rights, are both wanted by the ICC for unlawfully deporting and transporting Ukrainian children to Russia.

The arrest warrants mark the first international charges to be brought since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022 and the first against a leader of a country with a permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council.

“This is an important moment in the process of justice,” the ICC president, Judge Piotr Hofmański, said in a video statement.

Hofmański noted that, per procedures, the court’s chief prosecutor had presented his case against the pair to a panel of pretrial judges, who concluded that there were “credible allegations” against them.

The ICC does not recognize diplomatic immunity for leaders on charges of war crimes, crimes against humanity, or genocide.

Russia is not a party to the Rome Statute, the treaty that gave rise to the ICC, and is not likely to turn over Putin or Lvova-Belova for prosecution.

“The International Criminal Court has issued an arrest warrant against Vladimir Putin,” Dmitry Medvedev, former Russian presient and current deputy chairman of the Security Council of Russia, wrote on Twitter. “No need to explain WHERE this paper should be used🧻.”

But the charges, which do not expire, will make the pair international pariahs.

The 123 countries that have ratified the Rome Statute are urged to arrest any suspects in their territory.

“The ICC is doing its part of work. As a court of law, the judges issued arrest warrants. Their execution depends on international cooperation,” Hofmański said.

Israel recovers bodies of two dead hostages and a soldier from Gaza

0

Israel recovers bodiesThe Hostages and Missing Families Forum. Israel recovers bodies of two dead hostages and a soldier from Gaza.

Ofra Keidar was kidnapped by Hamas from a kibbutz during the 7 October attacks

The bodies of two Israeli hostages and a soldier have been recovered from the Gaza Strip, Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said.

He confirmed that Yonatan Samrano, Ofra Kedar and Staff Sgt Shai Levinson’s remains were retrieved on Saturday in a military operation.

“I thank our commanders and fighters for a successful operation, for their determination and courage,” Netanyahu said in a statement.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have recovered the bodies of eight hostages from Gaza so far this month.

“The campaign to return the abductees continues continuously and is taking place in parallel with the campaign against Iran,” Netanyahu said.

“We will not rest until we return all of our abductees home – both the living and the dead.”

The IDF said the bodies were recovered on Saturday, but did not say where in the Gaza Strip the remains were found.

Ms Keidar was 71 when she was killed at a kibbutz and her body taken into Gaza.

Staff Sgt Levinson “engaged and fought terrorists on the morning of 7 October and fell in combat,” the IDF said. He was 19 at the time of his death.

Earlier on Sunday, Mr Samerano’s father announced that his son’s body had been recovered by the Israeli army.

Posting on Instagram Kobi Samerano wrote: “Yesterday was Yonati’s Hebrew birthday. On his 23rd birthday, on the very day he was born, our Yonati was rescued in a heroic operation by the brave soldiers of the IDF and the Shin Bet.”

In a statement following the announcement, Israel’s Hostages and Missing Families Forum, which represents some of the hostages’ relatives, said: “Our hearts are with the Keidar, Samerano, and Levinson families today.

“Alongside the grief and pain, their return provides some comfort to the families who have waited in agony, uncertainty, and doubt for 625 days.

“Particularly against the backdrop of current military developments and the significant achievements in Iran, we want to emphasize that bringing back the remaining 50 hostages is the key to achieving complete Israeli victory.

“There will be no victory until the last hostage returns.”

Israel launched a military campaign in Gaza in response to the Hamas-led cross-border attack on 7 October 2023 in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage.

At least 54,677 people have been killed in Gaza during the war, according to the territory’s health ministry.

Some 54 of those captured during the attack by Hamas remain in captivity, including 31 the Israeli military says are dead.

Please, visit our Websites Homepages and Facebook Page for read latest news update.

Republicans line up behind Trump after strike on Iran — with few detractors

0

strike on Iran

Republicans line up behind Trump after strike on Iran — with few detractors. Republicans on Capitol Hill quickly lined up behind President Trump after he announced that the U.S. conducted a strike on three Iranian nuclear facilities, a strong show of support for the White House with few detractors inside the GOP.

Trump announced on Truth Social just before 8 p.m. EDT on Saturday that the U.S. “completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran,” including Fordow, the nuclear site hidden in a mountain south of Tehran. He is scheduled to address the nation from the White House at 10 p.m.

Republican leaders in the House and Senate backed the action, which had become a debate of sorts in Washington — especially among GOP — since Israel struck Iranian nuclear facilities earlier this month in what it called a “pre-emptive” attack.

“The military operations in Iran should serve as a clear reminder to our adversaries and allies that President Trump means what he says,” Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) wrote in a statement on X. “The President gave Iran’s leader every opportunity to make a deal, but Iran refused to commit to a nuclear disarmament agreement. President Trump has been consistent and clear that a nuclear-armed Iran will not be tolerated. That posture has now been enforced with strength, precision, and clarity.”

“The President’s decisive action prevents the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism, which chants ‘Death to America,’ from obtaining the most lethal weapon on the planet,” he added. “This is America First policy in action. God bless our brave men and women in uniform – the most lethal fighting force on the planet – as we pray for their safe return home. May God bless America.”

Johnson was briefed on the strike on Iran beforehand, a source familiar with the matter told The Hill.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) wrote in a statement with X: “I stand with President Trump.”

“The regime in Iran, which has committed itself to bringing ‘death to America’ and wiping Israel off the map, has rejected all diplomatic pathways to peace. The mullahs’ misguided pursuit of nuclear weapons must be stopped,” he said. “As we take action tonight to ensure a nuclear weapon remains out of reach for Iran, I stand with President Trump and pray for the American troops and personnel in harm’s way.”

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rick Crawford (R-Ark.), similarly, backed Trump after the strike on Iran and applauded him for making the “right call.”

“Iran has waged a war of terror against the United States for 46 years. We could never allow Iran to get nuclear weapons. God bless our brave troops. President Trump made the right call and the ayatollahs should recall his warning not to target Americans,” Cotton wrote on X.

“As I have said multiple times recently, I regret that Iran has brought the world to this point,” Crawford echoed in a statement. “That said, I am thankful President Trump understood that the red line — articulated by President of both parties for decades — was real. The United States and our allies, including Israel, are making it clear that the world would never accept Iran’s development of a nuclear weapon.”

While the majority of Republicans backed Trump in the wake of the strike on Iran, there were some GOP detractors on Capitol Hill.

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who has been advocating for the U.S. to avoid intervention in the Israel-Iran conflict, wrote on X minutes after Trump announced the offensive: “This is not Constitutional.” Massie helped lead a bipartisan war powers resolution to prohibit U.S. involvement in the Middle East dispute.

Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) suggested that the move was unconstitutional.

“While President Trump’s decision may prove just, it’s hard to conceive a rationale that’s Constitutional. I look forward to his remarks tonight,” he wrote on X.

Trump’s decision to strike on Iran a trio of Iranian nuclear sites came after a week of debate on Capitol Hill over whether the U.S. should take action in Iran after Israel launched an attack on Iran, prompting a back-and-forth between the two countries.

Trump on Thursday said he would decide whether to take action within the next two weeks.

“Based on the fact that there’s a substantial chance of negotiation that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go in the next two weeks,” Trump said in the statement read by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt.

The big question had been whether the U.S. would deploy a large bomb known as a “bunker buster” to strike on Iran the Fordow facility, which is underground. While some lawmakers advocated for the move, others — including some of the president’s most vocal supporters on the right-flank — pushed against the U.S. directly getting involved in the conflict.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), for example, said “Me and my district support President Trump and his MAGA agenda, it’s what we voted for in November, and foreign wars weren’t a part of it.” On Saturday night, she offered prayers for the safety of U.S. troops and Americans in the Middle East.

“Let us pray that we are not attacked by terrorists on our homeland after our border was open for the past 4 years and over 2 Million gotaways came in.🙏 Let us pray for peace. 🙏,” she added.

But across the GOP conferences on Capitol Hill, Republicans were quick to back the move by the president.

“Our commander-in-chief has made a deliberate —and correct— decision to eliminate the existential threat posed by the Iranian regime,” Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) wrote in a statement on X. “We now have very serious choices ahead to provide security for our citizens and our allies and stability for the middle-east. Well-done to our military personnel. You’re the best!”

House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.), the No. 3 House Republican, said Trump “was right then, and he is right today: NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE.”

“A nuclear Iran posed a threat to the Middle East and to the world. @POTUS has been consistent that this dangerous regime should NEVER possess a nuclear weapon,” he added in a statement on X.

Please, Visit our Homapage and Facebook for read Update news.

Why PayPal Stock Is a Screaming Buy for the Second Half of 2025

0


PayPal Holdings Inc logo and money-by Sergio Photone via Shutterstock
PayPal Holdings Inc logo and money-by Sergio Photone via Shutterstock

PayPal stock (PYPL) has had a bumpy ride since 2020. The stock more than doubled in 2020 and continued its good run in the first half of 2021. However, PYPL ended that year in the red, meeting the same fate for the next two years. 2024 was a welcome break for PayPal investors as the “law of averages” finally caught up with the stock, and it gained a respectable 39%, outperforming the S&P 500 Index ($SPX) after three consecutive years of underperformance.

Cut to 2025, and PYPL stock has already lost nearly 20% and is yet again massively underperforming the broader market, which has recovered from its April lows. I see the recent fall in PayPal stock as a good buying opportunity, as we’ll explore in this article.

www.barchart.com
www.barchart.com

PayPal started the year on a strong note but fell sharply after its Q4 2024 earnings. While the company posted better-than-expected revenues and profits for the quarter, and its guidance came in ahead of estimates, slowing growth at Braintree, its subsidiary focused on card processing, dampened sentiment.

The tariff chaos did not help, as fintech companies, including Affirm (AFRM) and PayPal, slumped in April amid concerns that tariffs could lead to a recession, hurting their business. Both these stocks have not yet recovered to their 2025 highs, even as tariff worries have greatly (if not fully) subsided.

While these are short-term headwinds, PayPal is facing some structural challenges in the form of higher competition across nearly all its business verticals. For instance, its branded checkout is facing intense competition from Apple Pay (AAPL) and Google Pay (GOOG), while the non-branded business faces competition from companies like Stripe. The P2P business is also facing competition from Zelle and Cash App (XYZ).

The competition has negatively impacted PayPal’s topline, which is now growing in single digits. With rising competition, digital payment companies have been feeling pressure on their take rate (the fees they charge for processing the transaction), and PayPal’s operating margins have fallen.

While I find corporate turnarounds a cliché, PayPal is a legit turnaround story under the new CEO, Alex Chriss, who is working on profitable growth. The strategy has shown results, and the company has had five consecutive quarters of profitable growth. PayPal has also made a foray into digital advertising, capitalizing on the vast consumer data that it possesses. The company is also using artificial intelligence to personalize experiences for customers.

Ford Ranger Plug-In Hybrid Review: Prices, Availability, Specs

0

Ford Ranger Plug Prices, Availability, Specs :

Fitness for purpose. Take a deftly aimed power tool to all the marketing flim-flam, and you can’t go far wrong with that mantra. There’s no messing around when it comes to a pick-up truck, a vehicle that has a clear job to do, and in most cases does it admirably.

Except that even this segment isn’t immune to mission creep, and these hardy vehicles are now expected to double as workhorse and acceptable all-round family transport. The Ford F-150 may typify the breed, but outside of the US the Ranger has been in active duty for more than 40 years. A global player since 2011, it sells in 180 territories worldwide, and is particularly dominant in the European pick-up market.

But get this, 80 percent of the Rangers sold in the UK last year were in Wildtrak spec, the version that swaddles the hard plastics in leather and ladles on the decals. It’s—deep breath—a genuine lifestyle vehicle, beloved by the sort of buyers who actually do stuff rather than just think about it.

Ford Ranger Plug

Now, at last, there’s an electrified version, though we’re talking hybrid rather than the whole enchilada. Ford sells the fully electric Lightning in the US, where it’s locked in battle with Tesla’s Cybertruck (though neither is setting the sales chart aflame), but this is the closest Brits are going to get for the foreseeable at least. Only Chinese maker Maxus sells an electric pick-up in the UK, a vehicle we wouldn’t recommend, and Toyota’s indestructible Hi-Lux makes do with a mild hybrid setup. This makes the Ranger PHEV a significant new arrival.

It shares its platform hardware with the VW Amarok, and is manufactured in Ford’s Silverton plant in South Africa. Until now, engine options have been limited to a 2.0-liter petrol or 3.0-liter diesel. The new car uses Ford’s excellent 2.3-liter “Ecoboost” turbo petrol unit (as previously seen in the Focus and Mustang), bolstered by a 75-kW (100-bhp) electric motor, packaged within the bell-housing of the 10-speed automatic transmission.

Pick-Up Philosophy

It’s fed by an 11.8-kWh battery (usable) that sits under the Ranger’s load bed. Despite its compact size, that still necessitated modifications to the vehicle’s ladder frame chassis, resulting in a 20-millimeter bulge. (It has a 1-metric-ton payload and can accommodate a Euro pallet between the wheelhouses.) An electronically controlled clutch engages and disengages the e-motor and combustion engine, switching between petrol, hybrid, and electric propulsion. Visual differences are limited to a second filler flap on the near-side rear wing, with a lightning bolt logo on it, which hides the charging port for the battery. On a 7-kW wall charger, it takes about 2.5 hours to charge.

Here’s how it works. EV Auto is the default setting, blending electric and petrol power in a way best suited to everyday use, or if you’re towing or lugging a heavy load. EV Now does what it says: This is for electric driving only, Ford claiming a range of around 26 miles (WLTP). EV Later allows the driver to store electric energy, particularly useful if you’re heading into the city or a zero-emission zone. Finally, there’s EV Charge, which sees the petrol engine charge the high-voltage battery, though it won’t top it up by all that much. In addition to those, the PHEV maintains the driving modes used in extant Ranger models: Normal, Eco, Slippery, Tow/Haul, Mud/Ruts, and Sand. This new Ranger variant is clearly messing with the sacred strictures of the pick-up philosophy.

Please, visit our Homepage and follow our facebook page for read recent news.

Santi Cazorla helps Real Oviedo end 24-year LaLiga absence

0


Real Oviedo sealed their return to LaLiga after 24 years with a 3-2 aggregate victory over Mirandes in Saturday’s promotion playoff.

Oviedo triumphed 3-1 at home, overturning a first-leg deficit with goals from Santi Cazorla, Ilyas Chaira and Francisco Portillo. A packed Estadio Carlos Tartiere erupted as fans stormed the pitch at the final whistle.

The club from the Principality of Asturias, in the northwest of Spain, will now join Levante and Elche in next season’s top tier, replacing relegated Leganes, Las Palmas and Valladolid.

“There’s no way to describe what this means to us. These players are heroes, every single one of them. They deserve great recognition,” Oviedo coach Veljko Paunovic told LaLiga TV.

Iranian Girls Detained For Doing A TikTok Dance In Public

0


In September 2022, the death of Mahsa Amini, a Kurdish woman who died in police custody after she was detained by the morality police for wearing a hijab “improperly,” sparked widespread protest around Iran. Authorities claimed Amini died of a heart attack while in custody, while her family said she was beaten. The demonstrations over her death quickly morphed into wider discontent with the regime.

In the six months since, Iranian security forces have routinely used draconian tactics to try to suppress protests, going so far as to arrest children. In a report released Thursday, Amnesty International found children arrested during and after protests had been subject to electric shocks on their body, had their heads held underwater, been sexually assaulted, and been threatened with rape. Many children were released only after they signed “repentance” letters and promised not to participate in further protests, according to the human rights organization. The Iranian government has not responded to the report and did not immediately respond to BuzzFeed News’ request for comment.

A mysterious wave of suspected poisonings across the country has also landed more than 1,000 schoolgirls in the hospital. Iranian Interior Minister Ahmad Vahidi, whose department is spearheading investigations into the poisoning reports, said in early March that 90% of the hospitalizations came from “stress and worries caused by the news.” Many Iranians have dismissed that explanation, calling Vahidi’s claim “ridiculous” and criticizing the regime for not taking action on the reports despite widespread surveillance of residents.

In a Thursday press release, the United Nations called the poisonings “deliberate” and condemned the government for failing to protect the girls and swiftly investigate the cases.

“There is a stark contrast between the rapid deployment of force to arrest and jail peaceful protestors and an incapacity spanning months to identify and arrest perpetrators of large scale, coordinated attacks against young girls in Iran,” UN experts said.

The US has changed the course of the conflict-US strikes

0

Trump says Iran must make peace or face future attacks after US strikes

As Benjamin Netanyahu stood at the podium in the Israeli prime minister’s office this morning, he did not at first address the Israeli people in Hebrew, to update them on the latest, dramatic development in this, his latest war.

Instead he spoke in English, speaking directly to, and lavishing praise upon, US President Donald Trump after the US bombed Iranian nuclear sites.

If Netanyahu’s tone was triumphant, and the smile barely suppressed, it is hardly surprising. He has spent most of his political career obsessed with the threat he believes Iran poses to Israel.

Netanyahu has spent much of the last 15 years attempting to persuade his American allies that only military action (and only American munitions) could destroy Iran’s nuclear weapons programme.

While congratulating Trump for a bold decision that “will change history”, Netanyahu can also congratulate himself on changing the mind of a US president who campaigned against overseas military adventures, and whose supporters were overwhelmingly opposed to joining Israel’s war against Iran.

It should also be noted that Trump’s own intelligence agencies had not shared Israel’s assessment of how quickly Iran could seek to build a nuclear weapon, nor indeed whether it had taken the decision to do so.

Throughout this conflict, which began just 10 days ago, Israel’s government and military have insisted that Israel had the capacity to deal with the Iranian threat on its own.

But it was no secret that only America possessed the massive ordnance capable of dealing with the strongest levels of protection around Iran’s nuclear facilities, particularly at Fordo, built deep inside a mountain.

If the nuclear sites bombed last night are now indeed out of use then Israel’s prime minister will be able to declare his main war aim complete, perhaps bringing this conflict closer to an end. For its part, Iran says it had already moved its nuclear material out.

Us Strikes

But without last night’s bombing, Israel would have continued working its way down the long list of targets its air force has spent years drawing up.

Damage would continue to have been inflicted on the Iranian military, on its commanders, on nuclear scientists, on government infrastructure and on the parts of the nuclear programme accessible to Israel’s bombs.

But Netanyahu may have been denied a clear point at which Israel could say the nuclear threat had been definitively neutralised. Perhaps only regime change in Iran could have delivered that moment.

The B2 bombers have undoubtedly changed the trajectory of the war. Whether it escalates even further will depend on how Iran and its allies respond.

Last week Iran’s supreme leader had vowed to hit back at the US were it to enter the war. “The Americans should know that any US military intervention will undoubtedly be accompanied by irreparable damage,” Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said.

EPA  Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali KhameneiEPA
Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had said a US military intervention would cause “irreparable damage”

Only on Saturday the Houthi group in Yemen – staunch Iranian allies – had threatened to attack US ships transiting through the Red Sea if America entered the war.

American military personnel, businesses, and citizens in the region are now potential targets. Iran can strike back in multiple ways, should it so chose, attacking US warships, or bases in the Gulf, and potentially disrupting the flow of oil from the Gulf, and sending the price of petrol soaring.

The US has signalled that, for now, its military action is over, and it has no interest in bringing down the government in Tehran.

That may encourage Iran to limit its response, perhaps attacking US targets in ways that do not lead to high casualties, or using proxies in the region to do the same.

Iran chose to follow this course after Trump ordered the assassination of Iranian Revolutionary Guard leader Qasem Soleimani in 2020. On Saturday night, the US president repeated his own threat to Iran, to use overwhelming force to counter any retaliation.

This morning the whole of the Middle East is holding its breath, waiting to see whether this marks the beginning of the end of this conflict, or the beginning of an even more deadly phase to the war.

Trump warns of more attacks; lauds 'spectacular military success' on Iran nuclear sites

0

Trump warns of more attacks ??

Trump warns of more attacks

President Trump on Saturday declared U.S. strikes on Iran’s key nuclear facilities were a “spectacular military success,” but warned in an address to the nation that he could order further action if Tehran does not agree to a satisfactory peace agreement.

“Our objective was the destruction of Iran’s nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world’s number one state sponsor of terror,” Trump said in remarks from the Cross Hall at the White House. “Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success.”

The president had announced hours earlier on Truth Social that the U.S. had bombed three Iranian nuclear facilities: Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. In his remarks on Saturday night, Trump said those facilities “have been completely and totally obliterated.”

Trump, who was joined by Vice President Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth for his remarks, warned that Saturday’s strikes could be the first in a wave of actions against Iran, which has been locked in conflict with Israel for nearly two weeks.

Trump delivered his address from the doorway of the East Room, with the grand foyer in the background, the same place former President Obama delivered his address to the nation announcing the killing of Osama Bin Laden.

In a Truth Social post shortly after his on-camera remarks, Trump warned that any retaliation from Iran would be met with “force far greater than what was witnessed tonight.”

“This cannot continue. There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days,” Trump said. “Remember, there are many targets left. Tonight’s was the most difficult of them all, by far, and perhaps the most lethal. But if peace does not come quickly we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill.”

The president did not offer specifics on what an acceptable peace agreement with Iran would look like, or how negotiations might proceed in the wake of the U.S. strikes. He has previously said Iran cannot be allowed to achieve a nuclear weapon, and that Tehran cannot be allowed to enrich uranium as part of any deal.

Fox News and The New York Times reported the U.S. dropped six “bunker-buster” bombs on the Fordow nuclear facility, which is buried deep in a mountain. Trump said Hegseth and other top Pentagon officials would address the public on Sunday morning.

Trump spoke after the U.S. attack with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The president said in Saturday’s address that the U.S. and Israel “worked as a team.”

The White House released photos of Trump in the Situation Room during Saturday’s operation. Others in the room included Vance, Rubio, Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, White House chief of staff Susie Wiles and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine.

Trump had indicated as recently as Friday that he was willing to give Iran two weeks before taking direct action, a signal he was holding out for a diplomatic solution.

Saturday’s strikes raised immediate questions about the extent of the U.S. involvement in the Middle East and about Trump’s authority to order the bombings without congressional approval.

While most Republicans expressed support for Trump’s actions against Iran, some suggested he was beyond his constitutional authority.

“This is not Constitutional,” Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) posted on X.

“While President Trump’s decision may prove just, it’s hard to conceive a rationale that’s Constitutional,” Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) posted ahead of Trump’s remarks.

The White House did not respond to a request for comment about those criticisms.

Visit Our Hompage and follow our Facebook for get Update news.

CrowdStrike Just Partnered Up With Nvidia. Should You Buy CRWD Stock Here?

0


Buy Button by Formatoriginal via Shutterstock
Buy Button by Formatoriginal via Shutterstock

CrowdStrike (CRWD) continues to ride the wave of soaring enterprise demand for artificial intelligence (AI)-native cybersecurity solutions, fueled by platform consolidation and the swift embrace of its Falcon Flex model. As businesses race to modernize security operations amid a rapidly evolving AI threat landscape, the company finds itself perfectly positioned.

On June 11, CrowdStrike’s shares surged 2% following the announcement that it would integrate its Falcon Cloud Security with Nvidia’s (NVDA) universal LLM NIM microservices and NeMo Safety. The collaboration delivers comprehensive protection for AI and over 100,000 large language models.

With large language models moving into production, the risk of AI-related threats such as data poisoning, tampering, and sensitive data leaks is escalating. CrowdStrike’s Falcon platform pairs seamlessly with NVIDIA NIM, offering full lifecycle defense by monitoring runtime behavior and leveraging AI-driven detection and response.

CRWD stock hit a new 52-week high on June 17 and is trading less than 2% beneath it as of this writing. Its Nvidia alliance could serve as the next catalyst for upward momentum.

Based in Austin, Texas, CrowdStrike (CRWD) is a $120.9 billion cybersecurity leader, delivering cloud-native protection for endpoints, workloads, identities and data.

In the past 52 weeks, CRWD stock has climbed 24.6%.

www.barchart.com
www.barchart.com

On June 3, CrowdStrike reported its first-quarter earnings for fiscal 2026, delivering results that outpaced management’s expectations. Revenues climbed steadily to $1.1 billion, marking a 20% year-over-year jump and aligning neatly with the Street’s forecasts. This marked the third consecutive quarter where revenues surpassed the $1 billion threshold, a feat driven in large part by the Falcon Flex Subscription Model.

As of the quarter’s end, annual recurring revenue (ARR) stood at $4.44 billion, reflecting a 22% year-over-year rise. The engine behind this surge was Falcon Flex again, which added $774 million in total account value this quarter alone, swelling the cumulative deal value of Falcon Flex accounts to $3.2 billion.